|
A
personal message to members of Congress regarding partial-birth
abortion
Note: This letter was originally posted to the ACLJ website
last spring, when the House and Senate were beginning work on the
bills that have now been approved.
March 7, 2003
TO: The Honorable
Members of the United States House of Representatives
TO: The Honorable Members of the United States Senate
Dear
Sir or Madam:
In the past
five to ten years, Congress has on three occasions taken up the
issue of partial-birth abortion -- twice during the previous administration,
and again last year. While legislators passed the first two bills,
President Clinton vetoed them. Last summer (July 24th to be precise),
the House passed H.R. 4965, the "Partial-Birth Abortion Ban
Act of 2002"; however, the bill was never allowed a vote in
the Senate.
Last month,
two pieces of legislation were introduced that would ban the procedure:
H.R. 760, introduced by Rep. Steve Chabot; and S. 3, introduced
by Sen. Rick Santorum.(1) It is my strong desire that you will fulfill
the request of the President in his State of the Union address and
pass this legislation so that it may be signed into law, "to
protect infants at the very hour of their birth."(2)
I cannot speak
to the particulars of the constitutionality of such legislation,
though I work at a law firm; nor can I speak to the theological
and/or ethical ramifications of the procedure, though several members
of my extended family are clergymen. Likewise, I cannot address
with any authority the medical aspect, though I have both relatives
and friends in the medical field. I can, however, express my personal
views as one whose parents could have chosen an abortion, but decided
instead to grant me the opportunity to live.
First, let
me share an abbreviated version of my story.
As Mom remembers
it, when I was born in 1978 via C-section only two days before her
twenty-third birthday, the doctor gave her startling news: "Your
baby has an anomaly. Have you heard of Spina Bifida?"
Almost immediately, I was rushed to a nearby children's hospital
to be treated; Mom wasn't even given a chance to see me, let alone
hold me, until hours later.
When the neurosurgeon
who had examined my CT scan spoke with my dad that afternoon, he
explained that I had extensive brain damage, and that it was unlikely
that I would have intelligence within the normal range.
That same doctor
spoke again with my dad a few days later to explain some of the
further surgeries I would need. In the midst of the conversation,
he also said something that caught Dad off-guard: "Mr. Wood,
this never has to happen to you again."
When Dad asked
him to elaborate, he said, "We can detect these children in
the womb."
"And repair
the problem?" Dad asked.
"No,"
replied the doctor. "Terminate the pregnancy."
This elicited
a strong but calm response from Dad: "Why don't we just go
in and kill him right now? It would avoid a lot of pain and suffering
for all of us." My dad then made sure that this doctor was
no longer assigned to care for me, because as he puts it, I would
be better off in the care of someone who didn't think I'd be better
off dead.
I tell this
story to illustrate a point. Although some so called "pro-choice"
advocates will try to excuse abortion as "eliminating an inconvenience"
and justify partial-birth abortion because the "fetus"
is not "viable", they forget that there are many -- myself
included -- who believe that life does not wait to begin until the
unborn child is fully outside its mother's womb. Although my parents
were unaware of my disabilities until I was born, had the technology
been used to detect them, my parents would still have never dared
to consider ending my life in the womb.
Many years
(and about a dozen surgeries) later, I joined my parents and thousands
of others in the Georgia Right to Life March, a peaceful pro-life
demonstration that wound through the streets of downtown Atlanta.
The sign I carried was one my mother had made, based on one we saw
another child carrying in a news story about a similar demonstration
in another state. The wording of the sign was simple: "I'm
glad my mommy let me live." Despite the aforementioned surgeries,
painful though they were, and the nine or so that have since followed,
I can still say with all sincerity, "I'm glad my mommy let
me live!" It is such a joy for me to be able to tell people
that I share the name of the great apostle Paul, who once described
a "thorn in [his] flesh, a messenger of Satan, to torment [him]."(3)
Because I have endured twenty-three surgeries, people have regularly
commented on my positive outlook on life. I take delight in explaining
that I feel the same assurance from God about my disabilities as
the apostle Paul did about his thorn: "My grace is sufficient
for you, for my power is made perfect in weakness."(4)
I am not trying
to use the biblical value-of-life concept as my argument for banning
partial-birth abortion; as I stated at the beginning, many of my
relatives and friends are clergymen, but I am not. However, I firmly
believe that no matter what your religious persuasion, every child
has the potential of leading a healthy, fulfilling life. I also
believe it is better to be "fighting abortion by adoption"(5)
than to deny infertile couples the possibility of having a family,
or the right of the unborn child to "life, liberty and the
pursuit of happiness."
In closing,
let me just say again, it is my sincere hope that you will act swiftly
to enact legislation that will ban this barbaric practice which
Rep. Charles Canady has asserted is a mere three inches from homicide.
Thank you for
allowing me to share my thoughts on this important issue.
Respectfully,
Paul Wood
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
1. NRLC "Backgrounder: Partial-Birth Abortion", February
14, 2003 (http://www.nrlc.org/abortion/pba/backgrounderpba021403.html)
2. "State
of the Union", January 28, 2003 (http://www.whitehouse.gov/news/releases/2003/01/20030128-19.html)
3. 2 Corinthians
12:7 (NIV)
4. Ibid., v.
9
5. Mother Teresa,
from her address at the National Prayer Breakfast, February 3, 1994
(http://www.ewtn.com/New_library/breakfast.htm)
Paul Wood
works as a communications assistant for the American Center for
Law and Justice.
|