Pro-Lifers
Cry Foul in NY Attorney General's Probe
By Jason Pierce
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
January 08, 2002
(CNSNews.com)
- The founder of a pro-life crisis pregnancy center in New York City
says his freedom of speech and religion are under attack by the state's
attorney general who has launched an investigation into whether the
center and others like it provided "deceptive" medical information
to pregnant women.
The office
of New York Democratic Attorney General Elliot Spitzer began issuing
subpoenas to several crisis pregnancy centers Friday. Other centers
expect to be served with the legal papers this week.
According
to a subpoena obtained by CNSNews.com, Spitzer's initial investigation
revealed that the centers "may have violated one or more ... statutes
by misrepresenting the services they provide, diagnosing pregnancy and
advising persons on medical options without being licensed to do so,
and/or providing deceptive and inaccurate medical information."
Under orders
of the subpoena, the centers, before Feb. 1, must provide copies of
all advertisements, Web site addresses, services provided, staff who
provide the services, training materials, blank forms, records of all
agreements made, and a list of all persons who received any service
from the clinics.
Chris Slattery,
the founder of Expectant Mother Care, which operates five centers in
New York City, says the investigation and "probable lawsuit"
are "an attack on the heart and soul of the pro-life movement's
compassionate wing."
"They
have attacked the freedom of religion and speech, to counsel the doubtful
women who are considering an abortion alternative like marriage and
adoption," Slattery said.
Slattery
has undertaken the task of gathering a legal team to defend the New
York crisis pregnancy centers. He says there are more than 100 centers
in the state, and 15 spread throughout the five boroughs of New York
City. The centers have been in operation since the mid-1980s, offering
women a variety of options to deal with their unwanted pregnancy, options
other than abortion.
Because of
complaints that the crisis pregnancy centers were failing to make clear
what services they provided, a law was passed in the 1980s requiring
the centers to label themselves "abortion alternatives" in
phone books. Most of the centers offer adoption services, placement
into maternity homes, free pre-natal care, free ultrasounds, free counseling,
and free child care supplies after the child is born.
The pregnancy
crisis centers do not take any public funds, only private donations.
They are recognized as a 501(c) 3 charity. Churches, organizations,
and individuals make up the crisis pregnancy centers' donor pool.
"What
they really want us to do is to put crosses in our ads, say we are pro-life
and [tell the public] 'don't call,'" Slattery said. "And if
a woman does call, say 'don't come in because we don't offer abortions,'
and if they do come in, then they want us to say 'please wait until
we have a licensed professional to counsel you who will be morally neutral
on abortion, who will give you non-directive counseling.'
"They
seem to feel we are deceptive if we advertise under 'abortion alternatives,'
that we offer confidential counseling, medical and safety information
and free ultrasounds, when we do," he said.
Slattery
said the next step for the crisis pregnancy centers is to "quash
the subpoenas that [Spitzer's office] is issuing." Slattery said
he also wants to uncover the "conspiracy between the National Abortion
Rights Action League (NARAL) and the attorney general to shut down the
crisis pregnancy centers."
Slattery
predicts a "snowball effect" if the subpoenas lead to lawsuits,
and eventually lead to the demise of the crisis pregnancy center.
"This
attack, if successful, will have ripple effects nationwide," Slattery
said. "Because if they can successfully ban counseling by volunteer,
lay people, this could spread across the country and literally cripple
the volunteer movement that is the heart and soul of compassionate abortion
alternatives counseling."
Spitzer's
office refused to comment. Repeated calls placed to the NARAL were not
returned.
|