Abortion-Cancer
Link: Some Experts Shifting Away From Outright Denial
By Patrick Goodenough
CNSNews.com Pacific Rim Bureau Chief
January 07, 2002
Pacific Rim
Bureau (CNSNews.com) - The settlement of a legal case based on claims
that abortion can heighten the risk of breast cancer could help a pro-life
drive to win wider acknowledgement that such a link exists, thus contributing
to a drop in the number of abortions.
That is the
view of Babette Francis, head of a pro-life women's organization in
Australia, whose lawyer husband represented the woman involved in the
lawsuit.
Attorney
Charles Francis said last week an abortionist had agreed to settle with
his client, who sued the doctor for not warning her beforehand about
the possible psychological damage of abortion, or telling her about
research findings linking abortion to breast cancer.
It was believed
to be the first case of its kind in the world, he said.
Pro-abortion
groups, along with some medical bodies, deny that having an abortion
can increase a woman's chances of contracting breast cancer. Warning
women in advance, they argue, is unnecessary and will merely add to
stress at what is already a difficult time.
But the U.S.-based
Coalition on Abortion/Breast Cancer says 28 out of 37 studies published
since 1957 have established a link and that this fact should be made
available to women considering an abortion.
Babette Francis,
national and overseas coordinator of the Endeavour Forum - an Australian
affiliate of the coalition - said her group had been campaigning on
the cancer-abortion link for the past two years.
Already it
had witnessed some advances, she said. Where once leading anti-cancer
organizations had denied any link existed, some were now "back-peddling,"
preferring to say that research in the field was inconclusive.
"They're
shifting their ground -- now they're saying it cannot be supported or
denied, or that no definitive statement can be made," Francis said.
A handout
to clinicians by the Anti-Cancer Council of Australia reads: "Current
epidemiological evidence does not allow any definitive statements on
the association between breast cancer and spontaneous or induced abortion."
An item on
its website says: "It has been suggested that abortion causes an
increased risk of breast cancer, however, studies to date have been
inconclusive."
And in a
letter to a British medical body, a representative of the Queensland
(Australia) Cancer Fund said its own view was "that we can neither
support nor deny the linkage."
Francis said
since breast cancer is a potentially fatal and always mutilating disease,
Australian doctors' failure to tell women that they had reached a conclusion
of neither supporting nor denying a cancer-abortion link was simply
"not good enough."
In Britain,
too, experts seem unwilling to state unequivocally that there is no
link between abortion and breast cancer. In its guidelines on abortion,
the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists says: "Available
evidence on an association between induced abortion and breast cancer
is inconclusive."
Dr. Thomas
Stuttaford, medical columnist for The Times, argued in 2000 that there
was no causative link. Last May, however, he wrote another column changing
his stance, saying: "Breast cancer is diagnosed in 33,000 women
in the UK each year; of these an unusually high proportion had an abortion
before eventually starting a family. Such women are up to four times
more likely to develop breast cancer."
But while
some specialists appear to be moving away from outright denial, the
American Cancer Society seems to have shifted in the opposite direction.
A fact sheet produced earlier by the society, quoted on the Coalition
on Abortion/Breast Cancer website, said that abortion "may be associated
with increased breast cancer risk."
That was
in 1996. The society subsequently asked the coalition to remove the
reference, stating its current view as: "There is no evidence of
a direct relationship between breast cancer and spontaneous abortion
[miscarriage] in most of the studies that have been published."
Francis said
it was her hope that publicity surrounding arguments about a link between
abortion and breast cancer would help reduce the number of abortions
in Australia - that women would "bypass the anti-cancer organizations
and make their own choices."
According
to Dr. Joel Brind, an American authority on the abortion-breast cancer
link, a 1988 study on Australian women found that abortion was a greater
risk factor for breast cancer than any other known factor, including
a family history of breast cancer.
The main
focus of the study was on dietary risk factors, and the finding regarding
abortion was never made public at the time.
Only seven
years later, in a paper published in a British medical publication,
did the unpublished material emerge, and it revealed a 160 percent increased
risk of breast cancer among Australian women who had had induced abortion.
Activist
groups such as the Endeavour Forum and the Coalition on Abortion/Breast
Cancer argue that such findings have been suppressed because the pro-abortion
lobby does not want to accept that abortions are not as safe for women
as they have maintained.
|