Davis
Will Sign Bill to Enshrine Roe v. Wade
By Michael L. Betsch
CNSNews.com Staff Writer
August 22, 2002
(CNSNews.com)
- Legislation specifically designed to protect the "reproductive
rights" of California women, regardless of changes in federal law,
is just one signature away from becoming law in the Golden State.
Split
along party lines, the California State Assembly Monday passed the Reproductive
Privacy Act (SB 1301) by a vote of 44-23 and sent the pro-abortion legislation
to Democratic Gov. Gray Davis for his signature.
"Yes,
he's going to sign it," Davis' spokesman Russ Lopez told CNSNews.com.
However, he did not indicate when the governor would formally do so.
Davis'
2002 campaign website already boasts that the incumbent governor "helped
make California the most pro-choice State in the nation, signing into
law seven pieces of legislation to strengthen a woman's right to choose."
According
to Lopez, Davis has been supportive of this bill since its introduction
into the State Assembly and he's been working closely with the bill's
author, Sen. Sheila Kuehl (D-Santa Monica).
Kuehl
said the assembly's nearly 50 percent approval of the bill confirms
Davis' notion that California is "taking the lead" on abortion
issues nationwide.
Heralded
by homosexual activists as California's first lesbian state senator,
Kuehl believes her pro-abortion bill will protect Californians from
an "anti-choice president, an anti-choice Congress and the Supreme
Court," which she fears is one vote away from overturning Roe v.
Wade.
Included
within Kuehl's legislation is a provision that allows women greater
access to the chemical abortion pill RU-486.
While
state law currently mandates only doctors can dispense RU-486, the Reproductive
Privacy Act would permit non-physicians including nurse practitioners,
nurse midwives and physician assistants to administer the abortion pill.
According
to an advocacy letter posted on the website of the California Abortion
and Reproductive Rights Action League (CARRAL), "The Reproductive
Privacy Act would provide women with greater access to abortion services
by allowing nurse practitioners, nurse midwives, physician assistants,
and other qualified health care professionals to act within their existing
scope of practice in relation to assisting with surgical abortions and
dispensing mifepristone (formerly known as RU-486)."
Further,
the CARRAL letter claims that Kuehl's bill "would ensure that California
has a constitutionally firm abortion law that protects the reproductive
rights of all Californians, now and in the future."
State
Assemblyman Tim Leslie (R-Tahoe City) criticized Kuehl's legislation
for neglecting to take into consideration the health and safety of "mothers"
by allowing non-physicians to dispense RU-486.
"The
bill's author, Sheila Kuehl, is running on another bill, SB 1345, that
mandates only qualified vets or assistants can perform anesthetic type
procedures on animals," Leslie said. "It is interesting to
note that while Senator Kuehl is strengthening the protections of dogs
and cats undergoing medical procedures, she is working to weaken the
health standards for women having an abortion."
"All
this is intended to do is sure-up and solidify permanently what is in
place," said California Catholic Conference spokesman David Pollard.
"The simple reality is that public policy has been established
and is being carried forward."
The
California Catholic Conference describes itself as the "official
voice" of the Catholic community in California's public policy
arena. The group notes that nearly 10 million Catholics make-up one-third
of the state's entire population.
"Obviously,
we're opposed to the whole concept of taking unborn life and everything
that crystallizes that in our society," Pollard said. However,
he said the Reproductive Privacy Act would make any attempt to reverse
Roe v. Wade "that much more difficult to come by."
"Nothing's
impossible," Pollard said regarding the possibility of overturning
abortion law in California, "But it virtually is anyhow,"
he added.
"[Abortion]
is just one of those elements of our society that we believe is causing
damage to society," Pollard said. "The more irreversible it
becomes, the more difficult it will be to control the damage that is
happening."
|