Woman
Sues British Doctors Over Abortion Trauma
By Mike Wendling
CNSNews.com London Bureau Chief
June 12, 2002
London
(CNSNews.com) - In the first case of its kind in the U.K., a woman is
suing Britain's state-run health service for emotional distress following
an abortion.
The
woman, who requested anonymity, had the abortion four years ago when
she was 24 years old. In an interview with BBC radio broadcast Wednesday,
she said the procedure was "very frightening."
"I
was really confused and I didn't know what to do so I ended up having
a termination at the local hospital," she said. "I certainly
wasn't in the right frame of mind to make any decisions like that."
After
the abortion, the woman said she drank heavily and eventually sought
counselling after she became pregnant again and gave birth to a boy.
"I'd
always realized what I'd done, but that (the birth) brought it all back,"
she said.
The
woman said doctors with the National Health Service (NHS) never inquired
about her mental state before the abortion.
"There
was no warning of any psychological effects or any links to breast cancer,"
she said. "I just want to make the NHS aware of their approach
... I think they need to do something about it."
Guidelines
The
Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists (RCOG) is responsible
for formulating national recommendations on what women should be told
about abortion.
The
instructions include a list of complications such as bleeding, perforation
of the uterus, infection and failure of the operation to terminate the
pregnancy, but do not include the possibility of mental problems.
The
guidelines, listed on the RCOG's website, say that after an abortion
"early distress, although common, is usually a continuation of
symptoms present before the abortion. Conversely, long-lasting, negative
effects on both mothers and their children are reported where abortion
has been denied."
The
instructions also stipulate, "Referral for further counselling
should be available for the small minority of women who experience long-term
post abortion distress."
Dr.
Gillian Penney, chairwoman of the RCOG's guideline development committee,
said that the organization's recommendations were thoroughly researched
and represented the balance of medical opinion.
"We
don't think it's necessary to warn women about psychological problems,"
she said.
Penney
said that for most women, the risk of mental health problems is greater
if an abortion is denied than if it is carried out.
"We've
brought together the whole body of evidence on this topic," she
said.
An
RCOG spokeswoman said Wednesday that the organization couldn't comment
specifically on the lawsuit.
Clash
on evidence
The
anonymous woman is being supported in her suit by Life, one of Britain's
leading pro-life groups, which called her "courageous."
"Women
are not only not getting the whole story, they're getting none of the
story. They are being put on a conveyor belt," said Jack Scarisbrick,
Life's national chairman. "The information pamphlets they get regarding
abortion are bland and imply that it is a simple procedure with few
regrets."
Scarisbrick
said that the RCOG has used outdated evidence in formulating its guidelines.
He
said that studies show that up to 10 percent of women suffer from server
psychological distress after an abortion and that women who have had
an abortion are three times more likely to attempt suicide than women
who carry a pregnancy to term.
"We
will keep piling up the evidence," he said. "It's coming thick
and fast from around the world."
But
Penney, the RCOG guidelines chief, said that groups interpreted evidence
"Depending
on your prejudices, you can be convinced of different conclusions on
this topic," she said. "There is no new evidence to contradict
the recommendations that have been made."
The
RCOG's recommendations are reviewed every two years, with the next review
of abortion guidelines scheduled for January 2003.
Scarisbrick
said his organization has already received women requesting Life's help
in pursuing claims against the NHS. Since most abortions in Britain
are approved by doctors on the grounds that a woman's mental health
is adversely affected by carrying a fetus to term, Scarisbrick said
successful suits could eventually halt most abortion in the U.K.
"The
floodgates could open," he said. "Women have not been told
the truth, they have been conned."
The
lawsuit comes a week after a smaller U.K. pro-life group claimed to
have videotape of private abortion clinics giving out misleading advice
about abortion.
The
U.K. Life League has been sending female supporters into clinics with
hidden video cameras. The organization's leaders said the videotapes
would be passed on to lawyers and would form the basis of a freely distributed
documentary.
|